Is democracy the best form of governance? Essay

body politic is debatably , by far the most repugn form of presidency for both, politicians and the large number. Though nation is often described as the brass elected by the people, there atomic number 18 cases where a countrys termination to change from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one has been campaignd upon by foreign interventions. However, recent political insurgency in countries where republic has been bring downd shows that for the people to truly engage and respect the ideals of res publica, it mustiness call forth naturally. Many argue that interventions clear be prospered given the aright conditions. For instance chances of the democratic transactions cosmos happy if the state has a invariable economy is relatively higher. There harbour been prehistoric successes like Ger umteen and Japan subsequently World War II where guile of democracy has worked. It is also seen that in many cases without intervention, the individuals who were seeki ng to defend their rights in their fatherland would have been unsuccessful.For example the peoples movement in Libya, though it had elaborationed lots suport would have been suppressed had it non been for the NATOs involvement. There is also the c one timept that promoting democracy promotes peace. If people atomic number 18 given their exemption to air their views and feelings of marginalization atomic number 18 pr sluiceted consequently terrorism is less possible to arise. gum olibanum promoting democracy by imposing it, we profit the chances of a peaceful creative activity. Many intrust that democracy is the best form of governance which ensures that the rights of the citizens are non violated and gives them the immunity to express their ideas and thus it is their humanitarian covenant to bring democracy to those who do non have it. On the contrary, it is believed that an intervention is real plausibly to fail as the administration is being make against the co untrys allow and is less likely to gain support. Democratic government activitys prove to be successful only when the government is chosen by the people and is more likely to verify respect and maintain order. Democracies are non necessarily more peaceful than an separate(prenominal) form of governments.Just because democracies have not gone to war in the past does not mean that it is less likely to go into war in the future. Invasions, primarily by the western nations, increase the stress between the East and the West and force the formation of terrorist groups which in turn threatens world peace. The 9/11 attack is proofread enough to say that imposing democracy fuels terrorist groups. In Osama Bin Ladens letter to the American people he cited interventions in Somalia, India,Palestine, Chechnya, Lebanon and Iraq as reasons for the attack. Just because we rate and believe on political ego determination being an important value, it does not mean that all nations believe in it too. For instance some nations exsanguinousthorn place on religious value and like to be ru conduct by a government which promises divine authority. And some may believe in constancy of the government and might not want it to keep up on changing every a couple of(prenominal) years.Countries of the middle east like Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan and so on can be taken as examples while considering countries which are non-democratic and peaceful. Taking recent happenings into consideration, western efforts to impose democracy has largely failed. For instance in countries like Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam the imposition of democracy has led to political instability solely lock western countries, United States in grouchy believes that it is their duty to bring democracy to other countries. Trying to transfer the western modus vivendi to totally antithetic locations with complex story and traditions is not an easy task. Besides, when people are bullied into following a completely different system, people are most likely to oppose it.Todays richly functional democratic countries complicate Spain, Portugal, Greece, etc which were once ruled by dictators and only sullen into democracies after homegrown movements and the politically instable countries include Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, etc where democracy was imposed. Thus, we can see that imposing democracy has led to nothing but disruption in the long term. enforce democracy has caused more disruption than peace. The white mans burden as the movement is most popularly referred to , has caused lots tension between the west and the east. statuesque democracy in countries where people rank values like religion and stability is not going to be successful as the people are not going to be cooperative. And the government formed that is not formed for the people is, by definition not a democracy. Democracy, even if established by imposition will still be the rule of the mass however for the people to truly accept this form of governance it must grow naturally.